jump to navigation

Warning, Budget / Avis will steal your pennies Friday 31st October, 2008.

Posted by teahot in Complaint, Quibble, Transport.
add a comment

After checking my credit card balance today, I realized that rather than charging me the agreed £99 for van hire last weekend, Budget had actually charged me £100. When I phoned up the guy on the end of the line said that the rate was £99.99 (I distinctly remember originally being quoted £99 over the phone) and rounding up was “what they do”. Making me feel like some moaning tight-wad, he grudgingly offered to send me the 1p by post.

I’m left feeling a little “used” by Budget Car and Van Rental by their caveat emptor approach to selling, making it the customer’s problem to double check invoices and receipts (the Budget Rent a Car brand is licensed within Europe to Zodiac Europe Ltd, a subsidiary of Avis Europe Plc, Registered in England and Wales No. 4634240).

How odd to sell your products at £99 but then go through this customer unfriendly sharp practice of adding 99p and rounding up the quote without asking the customer first. Are they really so hard up compared to the rest of us that they need to lie about their pricing this way or do they just consider it a tip?

Update (20-Nov-08): Called today for the second time about their 1p overcharge. Quoted rental agreement. He claimed that the 1p was sent to me “a week ago” but could not give a date. Offered to send out another 1p by post. I stated that I would escalate the matter if it did not turn up within a week.

I was rather unhappy with this conversation so I called customer services of the parent company, Avis, on 0870 608 6363 (I actually used the “say no to 0870″ website to find a normal number to call) they referred me to the Budget customer services number, 01344668833.

This was the right number. It turns out that my rental agreement was through a franchise rather than direct (from his tone it sounded like this is the cause of many issues) and that £19.99 had already been credited on my credit card for “service issues” on 6/11 though this may take 10 working days to come through. I was rather surprised as at no point had anyone explained to me that they were crediting anything for my dissatisfaction. He suggested that if I could not see this credited on my account by Monday I should call back. Sounds like a result, I guess someone in Budget / Avis may have realized that they might have been breaking the law by rounding up prices between an invoice and the amount actually charged on a credit card, even if it is only 1p.

Update 2 (29-Nov-08): It’s now 6 days later than the guy suggested that my account would be credited. Tediously I’ll have to phone again during the working week to find out if he was mis-reading his own log and the £19.99 refund was just a mistake.

Update 3 (1-Dec-08): After calling again I was transferred to the local office (St. Katherine’s Way) where I overheard a conversation between two colleagues in reference to my call saying that “tell him to fuck off, we don’t owe him anything”. I was unimpressed and have made a formal complaint in writing to Budget Customer Services.

Update 4 (20-Dec-08): Finally resolved in a way that proves it’s worth following through on your complaints. I received an apology from Budget and a refund of £19.99 back on my credit card. Next time I book a car I’ll be taking extra care over the paperwork, what a pity you have to double check such things.

Junkmail from The AA Wednesday 22nd October, 2008.

Posted by teahot in Complaint, Junk Mail.
Tags:
2 comments

I left The AA in 2004. Although I’m always careful to opt out of any marketing use of my details, since leaving they write to me every six months with joining up membership offers. Over the years I have phoned to complain (at least six times) and the last time I phoned I made notes of the conversation and the person involved assured me that I would get a response in writing.

I received no response and, predictably, six months further on I get another spam letter flagrantly misusing my customer records. I phoned again (wasting another 30 minutes of my time) but this time by calling twice managed to get a formal complaint reference number. In the process I found out that The AA had “opted in” ALL customers last year despite some of those customers having previously opted out, on the rationale that any customer who didn’t like it could complain!

A little research found that the Information Commissioner’s Office has an official PDF guideline document with a template letter so that you can send a legally recognised notice for a company to remove your records from their marketing database (see my Data Protection Act page). If they fail to do so within a reasonable time (the ICO recommends 28 days) you can either sue them for compensation or get the ICO to launch an investigation. So as well as having a formal complaint registered on their system, I have sent off a written notice. If I get another spam letter in six months time I’ll be able to get the ICO to investigate on my behalf. I’ll even do a little research into compensation, it may actually be worth the time taking them to court.

It’s a ruddy hassle but if more customers used the formal process I’m sure companies would stop misusing their data to make a quick buck.


The notice seemed to get their attention. I have received a letter by return on behalf of the Group Company Secretary (John Davies) assuring me that future marketing would be suppressed (within a 90 day period to go through their system, seems rather lax to me).

No written reply to my phone call so far, even with a registered complaint number. I guess “Customer Services” aren’t quite up to scratch compared to “Legal”.